Reintroduction of third level fees will be fought not just by students
Filed under: Education , also relevant to: Innovation, Personal Comment
The union of Students of Ireland (USI) held a briefing session in Dublin this week outlining the issues that they want addressed to ensure that Education continues to remain accessible as we face into a turbulent financial era.
Obviously the issue of 3rd levels fees was raised with USI opposed to their reintroduction rather they believe that it should be funded through the taxation system The Minster is due to bring forward his proposals in April this year and he appears to be championing a case to bring back 3rd level fees. Fine Gael are also looking at the issue and Brian Hayes, our Education spokesman, is due to produce a Green Paper on the matter outlining our alternative so there will be plenty of debate on the issue.
I think that there must be a focus on our 3rd level institutions and we must ensure that we have quality and measured outcomes for student. Our 3rd level institutions must match best standards internationally if we are to fulfil our “knowledge economy” ambitions. I heard recently that there are about 140 different engineering course available to students, is this really necessary? Could we not get some consolidation in this area?
Clearly the 3rd level institutions must work together and demonstrate an ability to introduce efficiencies as well as matching international standards. Education has always been the key to our success and it will become even more important as we compete in a tougher global economy. So before the debate on fees, loans or increased taxation to fund 3rd level let’s focus on quality.
Interesting to note that the services charges introduced in 1996/1997 at €190 are now set at €1500, fees by any other name!
What did you think about this article? I would love to hear your opinion, please leave a comment below. Thank you!
Other posts you might like to read:
2 Responses to “Reintroduction of third level fees will be fought not just by students”
Leave a Reply
Fri20Feb2009
Latest News Categories
My news section includes press releases and other official material but you can view all my personal comments here:
Personal Comments >>
Get updates by email - enter your email address:
Latest Comments
- Speaking on the Blocking of Child Pornography in The Seanad
- Susan Smyth: I think you don't know…
- Why we must tackle rip-off Republic culture
- hulu on apple tv 2: Very interesting details you have…
- how to get girlfriend back: Very interesting topic, appreciate it…
- Redundancy Payments due to Vita Cortex, Cork workers, must be paid - CLUNE
- filmy erotyczne: I think this is one…
- State must take active role in regulation of Home Care Services
- Dewayne Poehlman: Very good article.Really looking forward…
- Education cuts are an act of national sabotage
- Nyugdíj 2012 - Özvegyi nyugdíj 2012, öregségi nyugdíj, rokkantnyugdíj: I believe this is among…
- HSE Statement on Home Care Service
- Geraldine Lynch: This is a very well…

Your comments are interesting, but I think you may want to have conversations with the universities themselves. I know that some people still believe, as you imply also, that there are ‘inefficiencies’ in the university sector. I don’t doubt that there is always room for an assessment of how well we spend money (and that’s not confined to universities, but certainly includes Dail Eireann), but in international terms we are phenomenally ‘efficient’, spending less than 50 per cent per student than the average British university.
The problem is that this agenda is now undermining what you say is the main concern, quality. We can no longer maintain buildings, keep up library collections, ensure a reasonable staff-student ratio, and so forth. This simply cannot go on.
As for funding higher education through taxation (including a graduate tax or a PRSI-based method), this will not help us, as no government will ever agree to ring-fence taxation revenues for any particular purpose: the Department of Finance will always and totally veto that. So therefore the additional taxation will, almost inevitably, go somewhere else, as it is now doing.
Nevertheless, it is good to be discussion these things, and I am genuinely grateful for your interest and engagement.
February 21st, 2009 at 10:59 amIt sounds like you’re creating problems yourself by trying to solve this issue instead of looking at why their is a problem in the first place
May 8th, 2009 at 11:39 am